RAG-020RAG · Staying truthfullayaeval.ContextConflictDetection
Context Conflict
Do two fetched sources disagree with each other?
Simulation state:
When it passes
Sources agree.
Threshold satisfied: evaluation score <= 0.30.
When it fails
Sources conflict.
Violation detected: execution flagged for human review or fallback routing.
SDK Specification
| Parameter | Value | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Class | ContextConflictDetection | Python evaluator class in layaeval |
| Required Fields | "query", "retrieved_context" | Arguments expected in the call signature |
| Default Threshold | <= 0.30 | Passes when risk score is at or below this value |
| Category | RAG Evaluation | Staying truthful (Does every line come from the pages, with nothing made up?) |
Python Example
context-conflict.py
1from layaeval import ContextConflictDetection23metric = ContextConflictDetection(threshold=0.30) # passes when risk is at or below 0.3045res = metric(6 query="What is the capital of France?",7 retrieved_context="Paris is the capital of France, with 2.1M residents.",8)910print(res.passed, res.value, res.confidence)
Related RAG Checks
Other checks in Staying truthful
RAG-006Read →
Groundedness
Is each sentence in the answer backed by the sources?
RAG-007Read →
Strict Groundedness
A yes or no: is every claim proven? One gap fails it.
RAG-008Read →
Hallucination Risk
Did the answer invent facts that aren't in the sources?
RAG-014Read →
Context Utilization
Did the answer use the useful facts it was given?
RAG-018Read →
Claim Support
Is this single claim backed by the evidence?
RAG-019Read →
Contradiction Detection
Does the answer say the opposite of the sources?