AG-008Agent · Using toolslayaeval.ToolInputAccuracy
Tool Input Accuracy
Are the values sent to the tool correct?
Simulation state:
When it passes
All values make sense.
Threshold satisfied: evaluation score >= 3.0.
When it fails
A date that isn't a date.
Violation detected: execution flagged for human review or fallback routing.
SDK Specification
| Parameter | Value | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Class | ToolInputAccuracy | Python evaluator class in layaeval |
| Required Fields | "task", "tool_schema", "tool_input" | Arguments expected in the call signature |
| Default Threshold | >= 3.0 | Passes when quality score is at or above this value |
| Category | Agent Evaluation | Using tools (Right tool, right inputs, results actually used.) |
Python Example
tool-input-accuracy.py
1from layaeval import ToolInputAccuracy23metric = ToolInputAccuracy(threshold=3.0) # passes at or above 3.045res = metric(6 task="Book a hotel in Paris for 2 guests on Mar 4.",7 tool_schema={"city": "str", "date": "str", "guests": "int"},8 tool_input={"city": "Paris", "date": "2026-03-04", "guests": 2},9)1011print(res.passed, res.value, res.confidence)
Related Agent Checks
Other checks in Using tools
AG-005Read →
Tool Selection
Which tool is the best one for this step?
AG-006Read →
Tool Selection Correctness
Was the tool the agent picked the right one?
AG-007Read →
Tool Call Accuracy
Was the tool called the right way?
AG-009Read →
Tool Output Use
Did the agent use what the tool gave back?
AG-010Read →
Tool Necessity
Was calling a tool really needed here?